| At line 12 added 27 lines |
| After some experience with the Phabricator and other tools, here are our two cents: |
|
| Phabricator is a great tool for big organisations with a huge number of projects and developers, working together on a common target. If you would like to get an impression how big communities work together using Phabricator, please visit for example the Wikimedia (MediaWiki) Phabricator at [https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/]. |
|
| As we did not find good capabilities to measure successess or do estimations (complexity and efforts), most of us think, that is not the primary focus of the suite. |
| In our eyes it is not to drive small projects with limited budgets and a small number of developers. |
|
| Still it is a very comfortable tool to organize for example Scrum processes. |
|
| The interoperability of the several tools available in the suite is brilliant. This also is the case in terms of extensibility. |
|
| You will find applications for example: |
| ; Manifest: tasks and incident management, a nice mixture of Taskboards and Bugtracking software |
| ; Phriction: a Wiki application |
| ; Ponder: a kind of FAQ and Forum application |
| ; Conpherence: a browser based instant chat tool |
| ; Phame: a Blog application |
| ; Legalpad: place your NDAs, terms and conditions into written text and let users accept them in order to let them access Phabricator ressources |
| ; Diffusion: integrates seamlessly with GIT and Subversion repositories |
| ; Audit & Differential: for audits and code reviews |
| ...and lots of other usefull stuff. |
|
| A user may organize its own account into Dashboards, presenting its individual preferred contents. |
| Contents of the several applications are cross-connected. A user may flag contents for later evaluation, add the same tasks into several projects, move tasks from one project to another and may freely an so on. |
|
| There are some basic introductions into Phabricator on [YouTube|https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=phabricator]. |
|
